Saturday, December 20, 2014

Female Accountability

Vox Day made an interesting comment, one which seems to summarize many disparate issues: in today's feminist driven Messiah culture, women are not to be held accountable. While this applies to all Victimhood Groups, it is the feminists which control the campus and the dialog at the moment. Messiahism marches to the orders of feminists.

For example, it is being uncovered now that Jackie, the impetus behind the UVA rape fraud, also plagiarized love letters from TV shows. The entire Jackie fraud episode is raising no squall from the feminist Left. It was only the appearance of support for the Rape Culture Narrative that gained shrieks from the US president on down throughout the entire feminist Left. But the consequence of her lies brings no comments at all, except that her lies demonstrate a "broader truth".

As for consequences of this fraud, not a single player - not Jackie, not the writer, not the editor, not the university president - has encountered any fundamental consequence for her actions, other than having to dodge criticism and ridicule, neither of which influence Leftists.

The contrary to this is the university presidents and professors who have been fired and/or run off campus for statements which were, on the whole, pro-woman, yet not feminist enough.

The advent of the necessity for "trigger warnings" to prevent fainting and regurgitation by delicate women upon coming into contact with "situations" places the Victimhood Category into control of all situations, because any situation might be too much for the woman to bear. This means that men, any man, all men, are actually triggers, being rapists-in-waiting. Elevator-gate proved that.

It is now a designated Leftist fact that women are too fragile to survive in contemporary society. They cannot be held accountable because they are too fragile. Their accusations of persecution must be believed regardless of any actual material facts because the fragility of women in Leftist America places them into an alternative reality, one where they need not protect themselves from drunkenness or sexual predation, one where the existence of predation must be eradicated by eradicating the predators in order to protect the helpless females. In other words, an alternative reality where males can be only evil Oppressors: predators to be eradicated.

The necessary consequence is for men, not women. Feminist insistence on its Victimology necessarily requires misandry and the subsequent persecution of men. Under Victimology no designated victim can be responsible for her actions. This is demonstrated by black Victimhood, where terrorist actions are excused as merely "acting out frustratons". The same goes for the environment, where all bad weather is a reaction to human abuse of Gaia, while weather itself is no indication of AGW.

So a woman need not take precautionary measures, because males, the Oppressors, should be eradicated - that's the logic.

Females in this alternate reality should go ahead and behave however they wish - being as stoned and drunken as possible - and suffer no responsibility for their incapacity, much less any consequence from being incapacitated. They can easily see that only in a male-free universe can this be accomplished. That is Feminism Today. Basically lesbian totalitarian.



1 comment:

Rikalonius said...

I used to be able to find this clip on youtube, but they've done a major sweep of 'copyrighted' content in the last couple of years. It is a quote from Ally McBeal. John Fish was a great character in the first season, but he was too much a man and had to be emasculated later in the series. However in the first season he was deliberately impertinent. While defending a woman against sexual harassment. Defending her, mind you, he said the following:

"Personally, I hate sexual harassment laws. The original force behind them were disgruntled lesbians who felt they were not given the same opportunities. Along with ugly women, who are jealous of pretty women who got all the breaks in the work force. My cause to action is simple, women are victims. They need special help. Look, at the evolution of these sexual harassment laws. What we are really saying is women really should qualify under the Federal Disability Act. They are less able. They cannot cope with romance in the office. They cannot contend with having to do a job and have a man smile at them. It is too much. Look where we use to be, first quid pro quo, then hostile environment, and now Seinfeld episodes. Women can't take it they bruise too easily. The laws are here to protect the weak and most vulnerable in society. She is woman, protect her!"